FacebookTwitterRSS
 
Judge slams prosecutor Print E-mail
Friday, 13 November 2009 03:01
What’s the appropriate sentence for someone collecting at least 2,300 child pornography images?  If you’re Ohio Prosecutor Lisa Neroda, you think at least 10 years. If you’re Common Pleas Judge Vincent Culotta, not only do you think 4 years will suffice, but you’ll chastise the prosecutor for her recommendation.

According to the Willoughby, Ohio News-Herald, Judge Culotta angrily responded to Neroda’s recommendation: “I’m ...not trying to minimize Mr. Skala’s conduct, but I’ve got to compare it with other cases of similar nature. There are a number of cases where people are being sentenced for actually harming children, and the recommendation does not even come close to 10 years...You do realize that he never actually touched a child, right?”
 
The judge did bolster his point with prosecutors, giving them "recent examples in which the prosecutor's office recommended lesser sentences for actual sexual assaults," says the paper.

His Public Defender, Charles Grieshammer asked for probation and duly noted of his client: “It’s not like he was paying for anything. It’s out there.”

Neroda’s response was succinct: “The FBI and sheriff’s office indicated this may be one of the largest volumes (of child porn). He was viewing pictures of children who were touched (by others), and they are victimized each and every time someone watches.”

While it's disturbing when any judge minimizes sentencing for child pornography crimes, traditional child abuse prosecution practices do raise questions about disparate sentencing. Prosecutors routinely offer extremely light plea bargains for serious crimes against children, simply because their cases are not 'slam-dunk' easy, like most child pornography cases are. Prosecutors who are chronically risk-averse (or hard work-averse) commonly offer defendants minimal jail time and sex offender registration for repeated child rape, hoping to avoid a challenging, time-consuming trial they might not win.

But judges like Culotta know how the system works... and they should know how serious child exploitation crimes are.
 
Email Sign-Up
The PROTECT Lobby
ACC-C4
Our Mission

The National Association to Protect Children is a national, pro-child, anti-crime membership association. We are founded on the belief that our first and most sacred obligation as parents, citizens, and members of the human species is the protection of children from harm.

PROTECT is a bipartisan pro-child, anti-crime lobby whose sole focus is making the protection of children a top political and policy priority at the national, state and local level.

Donate Now
noveltees.png

©2002-2012 PROTECT and the National Association to Protect Children.
ABOUT | CONTACT

a Cube Creative Design site